<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Twitter and Google have a deal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/10/12/do-twitter-and-google-have-a-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/10/12/do-twitter-and-google-have-a-deal/</link>
	<description>&#34;Watching out for you, one tweet at a time&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:04:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breaking: Twitter makes Deal with Google and Bing &#124; TwitterWatchDog.com</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/10/12/do-twitter-and-google-have-a-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking: Twitter makes Deal with Google and Bing &#124; TwitterWatchDog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=2601#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>[...] a little over 1 week ago TwitterWatchDog reported &#8220;Do Twitter and Google have a deal? Well the deal didn&#8217;t take long and it includes Bing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a little over 1 week ago TwitterWatchDog reported &#8220;Do Twitter and Google have a deal? Well the deal didn&#8217;t take long and it includes Bing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Linus</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/10/12/do-twitter-and-google-have-a-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Linus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=2601#comment-1251</guid>
		<description>hmmm... http://twoogel.com is interesting! Perhaps a test site for Google? Pretty neat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm&#8230; <a href="http://twoogel.com" rel="nofollow">http://twoogel.com</a> is interesting! Perhaps a test site for Google? Pretty neat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Tinney</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/10/12/do-twitter-and-google-have-a-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Tinney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=2601#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>Would this be an extension of http://twoogel.com ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this be an extension of <a href="http://twoogel.com" rel="nofollow">http://twoogel.com</a> ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/10/12/do-twitter-and-google-have-a-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=2601#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>I agree with u Ark and Bryan...but Paul J. G. makes a good point too, i don&#039;t know, Twitter is not just for Spammers, we just like quick info...I don&#039;t spam, and most (not all) of my followers do either...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with u Ark and Bryan&#8230;but Paul J. G. makes a good point too, i don&#8217;t know, Twitter is not just for Spammers, we just like quick info&#8230;I don&#8217;t spam, and most (not all) of my followers do either&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/10/12/do-twitter-and-google-have-a-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=2601#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Ark, Twitter is already such a Spamfest, this just might spell the end for Twitter. At least for me and anyone else that&#039;s interested in Twitter for any other reason than Spamming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Ark, Twitter is already such a Spamfest, this just might spell the end for Twitter. At least for me and anyone else that&#8217;s interested in Twitter for any other reason than Spamming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ark</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/10/12/do-twitter-and-google-have-a-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>ark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=2601#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>This deal would surely change the SEO landscape.

Twitter already has millions of spammers, I&#039;m sure this will double up in no time at all once this happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This deal would surely change the SEO landscape.</p>
<p>Twitter already has millions of spammers, I&#8217;m sure this will double up in no time at all once this happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @LadyLegacy</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/10/12/do-twitter-and-google-have-a-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>@LadyLegacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=2601#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>Paul J.G. makes a valid point.  Google already returns results with tweets from Twitter if the keywords are right.  I guess we will see, but I&#039;m curious to see exactly how much Twitter is going to pay for this already provided service.  I appreciate Google all the way around but this &quot;deal&quot; seems like a waste of time &amp; money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul J.G. makes a valid point.  Google already returns results with tweets from Twitter if the keywords are right.  I guess we will see, but I&#8217;m curious to see exactly how much Twitter is going to pay for this already provided service.  I appreciate Google all the way around but this &#8220;deal&#8221; seems like a waste of time &amp; money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

