<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follower Counts Reduced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/follower-counts-reduced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/follower-counts-reduced/</link>
	<description>&#34;Watching out for you, one tweet at a time&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:04:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robyn McMaster</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/follower-counts-reduced/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Robyn McMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=944#comment-370</guid>
		<description>My followers and folks I follow have remained stable.  I scrutinize people who follow before I choose to follow them.  That evidently helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My followers and folks I follow have remained stable.  I scrutinize people who follow before I choose to follow them.  That evidently helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwitterWatchDog</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/follower-counts-reduced/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>TwitterWatchDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 06:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=944#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Maybe that was going on to see if you were paying attention haha. 

Good eye, good catch~

Thanks for the comment
-Al
@alferretti</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe that was going on to see if you were paying attention haha. </p>
<p>Good eye, good catch~</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment<br />
-Al<br />
@alferretti</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwitterWatchDog</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/follower-counts-reduced/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>TwitterWatchDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 06:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=944#comment-349</guid>
		<description>Did you take a peek a tweetblocker.com,perhaps that help you.....

-Al
@alferretti</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you take a peek a tweetblocker.com,perhaps that help you&#8230;..</p>
<p>-Al<br />
@alferretti</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erasmo Velez</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/follower-counts-reduced/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Erasmo Velez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=944#comment-346</guid>
		<description>At one point I had double the followers which was about 1300 which was confusing. I thought there was something i said or did that caused so many people to follow. I posted a tweet about it, The next day have of the followers were gone. Which weren&#039;t actual followers, but it&#039;s a good thing to see that the Twitter Admin is on top of their platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At one point I had double the followers which was about 1300 which was confusing. I thought there was something i said or did that caused so many people to follow. I posted a tweet about it, The next day have of the followers were gone. Which weren&#8217;t actual followers, but it&#8217;s a good thing to see that the Twitter Admin is on top of their platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisa Benay</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/follower-counts-reduced/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisa Benay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=944#comment-345</guid>
		<description>I keep hearing that twitter is &quot;cleaning house&quot;, and yet since the first time I heard this about 2 weeks ago, I&#039;ve had to manually block about 350 spam followers.  They all have the exact same format: 1) their location is &quot;US&quot;, 2) they have goofy 13-16 character names that don&#039;t make sense, 3) their posts are random posts taken from other accounts, each one itself seems ligit, but when you read a person&#039;s posts, you can tell they aren&#039;t from the same person, 4) some of the posts are in a foreign language, and 5) they are usually following a huge number of people, but only have a small number of followers.

Can twitter get rid of these people?  I don&#039;t think having to manually block 30 people per day is quality use of my twitter time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep hearing that twitter is &#8220;cleaning house&#8221;, and yet since the first time I heard this about 2 weeks ago, I&#8217;ve had to manually block about 350 spam followers.  They all have the exact same format: 1) their location is &#8220;US&#8221;, 2) they have goofy 13-16 character names that don&#8217;t make sense, 3) their posts are random posts taken from other accounts, each one itself seems ligit, but when you read a person&#8217;s posts, you can tell they aren&#8217;t from the same person, 4) some of the posts are in a foreign language, and 5) they are usually following a huge number of people, but only have a small number of followers.</p>
<p>Can twitter get rid of these people?  I don&#8217;t think having to manually block 30 people per day is quality use of my twitter time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O.G. Net</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/follower-counts-reduced/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>O.G. Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=944#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Same, that is a relief.

I was avidly checking twittercounter daily and was really surprised when I saw a drop of about 130 followers!

Thanks for the reassurance, I don&#039;t mind if it&#039;s &quot;fake&quot; people I&#039;ve lost!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same, that is a relief.</p>
<p>I was avidly checking twittercounter daily and was really surprised when I saw a drop of about 130 followers!</p>
<p>Thanks for the reassurance, I don&#8217;t mind if it&#8217;s &#8220;fake&#8221; people I&#8217;ve lost!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger ewing</title>
		<link>http://twitterwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/follower-counts-reduced/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>roger ewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterwatchdog.com/?p=944#comment-320</guid>
		<description>good to know. I thought something was amiss.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good to know. I thought something was amiss.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

